Environmental concerns and rising utility costs make energy optimization critical in powder handling factories. This guide reviews potential energy savings in pneumatic conveying, mixing, and filtration systems, providing engineers with the tools needed to build viable investment proposals.
Companies in the bulk solids handling field often struggle to find obvious ways to improve their environmental footprint. This article focuses on common unit operations (pneumatic conveying, mixing, pulse jet filters) present in nearly all processes.
The air mover is generally a Roots blower. Calculating the air velocity (\(v\)) and solids loading ratio (\(SLR\)) is critical.
\[ v = \frac{Q}{A} \text{ and } SLR = \frac{\dot{m}_{solids}}{\dot{m}_{air}} \]
Example: A blower at 100% capacity consumes 20.6 kW. By reducing speed to achieve a 20 m/s pick-up velocity, power drops to 11 kW. For 8,000 h/y operation at $0.10/kWh, savings total $7,680/year.
Dense phase uses compressed air, which is expensive to produce. Aim for low velocity (3-8 m/s) and high $SLR > 30$.
\[ \text{Savings} = (Q_{old} - Q_{new}) \times \text{Hours} \times \text{Cost per } Nm^3 \]
Example: Improving $SLR$ from 10.7 to 30 reduces air consumption by 225 Nm³/h. At $0.01 per Nm³, 4,000 h/y yields $9,000/year in savings.
Many filters pulse every 15s regardless of dust load. Increasing the interval to 60s reduces air consumption significantly.
\[ V_{air} = f \times P \times V_{tank} \]
where \(f\) is frequency, \(P\) is pressure, and \(V_{tank}\) is tank volume.
Optimizing mixing time ensures heavy kW motors run only as long as required for homogeneity. Saving just 2 minutes per batch over 50,000 batches/year can save $2,500/year.